So long to a relic: The Fairness Doctrine
Regulation required stations to present opposing views
August 23, 2011
Twenty-four years after the Federal Communications Commission stopped enforcing it, the Fairness Doctrine is finally being struck from the agency’s book of regulations.
The FCC said yesterday that it will eliminate the controversial law, which was instituted in 1949 to ensure that all broadcasters gave equal time to differing political viewpoints, as part of a greater agency housecleaning that will strike down a total of 83 other little-enforced rules.
The Fairness Doctrine made sense, at least in theory, when it was introduced during the Harry Truman era. Back then there were fewer media outlets, and a lot of areas of the country, as well as big cities, were dominated by political machines that often exercised their power to stifle dissent.
Regulators wanted to ensure that listeners and viewers were exposed to a balanced range of political views instead of just one.
In practice, however, the Fairness Doctrine put a chill on political coverage. In the early years stations were reluctant to allow political talk of any sort for fear they would not present enough balance to satisfy government regulators.
As the media world matured, and viewpoints on the left and right became plentiful on news talk shows, as well as cable outlets such as Fox News Channel and MSNBC, the rule seemed more and more antiquated.
Though it stayed on the books, the FCC stopped enforcing it in 1987.
That did not stop some from attempting to have it enforced.
Occasionally someone on the left or right would call upon the FCC to step in, typically when their opponents were seen to be getting more coverage than they thought they deserved.
For example, a few years back, Democrats pressed the FCC to look into the plethora of right-leaning radio talk shows on stations that did not present a similar left-leaning option.
But those requests never resulted in an actual investigation, and earlier this summer FCC chairman Julius Genachowski told Congress that he intended to get rid of the rule.
It won’t be officially stricken from the books for several weeks, however. The FCC has to publish a notice in the Federal Register first.
After nearly 18 years, it’s time to say good-bye
Yet more evidence native advertising doesn’t work
A new type of cord-cutting: Snipping broadband
Coming, the collapse of radio’s iHeartMedia
Weeklies: Surviving if not thriving in digital age
Tweeter in chief: How Trump could save Twitter
Shows Trump hates are seeing big ad gains
Broadcast vs. cable: How the top shows stack up
A sign that coughs at your cigarette smoke
The word: Time Inc. sale is imminent
Rundown: Which advertisers have jumped from YouTube
Media Life’s Digital Media Transparency Initiative
HBO does hard time with Dwayne Johnson
- Arun Kumar becomes chief data and marketing tech officer at IPG
- Jenny Campbell rises to managing director at 72andSunny
- Adam Crandall becomes director of strategy at mono
- Mark Wildman rises to EVP of partnerships at Westwood One
- Kevin Craig rises to SVP of newspaper relations at AMG/Parade
- Bill Corvalan becomes VP of West Coast partnerships at AllOver Media
- Richard Just becomes editor at The Washington Post Magazine
- Gemma Lawson rises to VP and design director at Nickelodeon
- Ashley Judd joins Epix' 'Berlin Station'
- Former NBC ad sales executive Robert Blackmore dies at age 90
This week’s broadcast ratings
This week’s cable ratings
This week’s top-rated movies, songs and books
This week’s daypart ratings
This month’s digital traffic data: December 2016
Ad sales rep for a digital-only magazine
Freelance media planner/buyer available for all markets
Wanted: Media buyer in Philadelphia
Paid social media planner wanted in Detroit
Opening for a media planner at a top OOH agency